According CEBAG, that abandonment occurs after the following route plan in the last five years:
In 2008, the Municipal General Management Plan of Totana was provisionally approved by the House with only the votes of the PP, relying on the opposition of more than 14,000 claims.
In May 2011, on the eve of the municipal elections, approval was published partially Plan suspending its application is subject to numerous deficiencies remedied that suffered Plan, which made it impracticable, as the technical, almost entirely.
The new PP government team resulting from the 2011 elections, was a specific commission, with the new Mayor in front, to study their correction and revision of the Plan, in addition to the three political groups also participated two business organizations , one CEBAG.
The result of the work of this group was the adoption by the plenary 29-12-2011, by guidelines of "a new model regional and city" that was said literally in the preamble to these guidelines consensual agreement; " are so important ... and entity to radically transform the urban development model proposed so far. "
But according CEBAG, in the 16 months since that Committee has met only twice to inform the efforts being made by the Autonomous Community, having been requested in these by CEBAG documentation of draft proposals had been made by the city council and the interim responses from various departments of the Autonomous Community.
But the Mayor, President of the Commission, has repeatedly refused to facilitate them, claiming they were supposedly confidential documents that could not be delivered to the Commission and that they could only know the municipal technicians.
According to reports from CEBAG, last April, when by the Mayor have convened a series of meetings of the new revision of the General Plan; CEBAG again requested in advance as to facilitate members of the Commission The documentation relating to the topics and proposals and counterproposals and negotiations conducted with the autonomous region, and that were addressed by the partial aspects of the Plan Commission until it was known and debatiesen various general issues thereof, as the future agreements.
Because according CEBAG, made agreements that were two radically different model scenarios, with forecasts and infrastructure needs completely different.
As interpreted by CEBAG it was: either a Totana with a development model based on developments and 40,000 new homes and 150,000 inhabitants.
And another Totana, which according CEBAG is the one described in the consensus-based guidelines in the current economic model (agriculture and food industry and tourism development), which would make forecasts for growth and urban economic activity based on the current model economic.
But the Mayor answered CEBAG documentation would facilitate a meeting on May 10 and also the Commission would not make general assessments enter the Plan and the agreements but only in the town.
When the representative of CEBAG was presented on the 10th at the first meeting of the Commission and stated that he was not any documentation facilitated nor are they going to report the Plan negotiation process, left the meeting and the Commission, noting for written CEBAG position.
CEBAG also subsequently in writing addressed to the Mayor of Totana, denouncing him flagrant breaches of the guidelines and consensus agreements by Parliament December 2011, according to the draft land use plan provided by the City Council last month of November-against agreed by said full-maintained urban development envisaged by the agreements and protects and does not developable to build agricultural or single family home in 5000 meters, agricultural and rural estates of several thousand homeowners several thousand hectares and tens of millions of meters, located in places such as, among others, the north of the highway, the Garden, Stables, Carivete, Santa Leocadia, Morti or Purgatory.
From CEBAG-that more than 7,000 claims filed to the Plan suspended, now intends to revise and even introduced and maintains an administrative appeal against it-has stated that "we are not prepared to tolerate that the City intended to protect and mortgage farms thousands of totaneros and use them as currency, as compensation and compensation, the folly of maintaining cover to make tens of thousands of homes scheduled in the agreements, to avoid having to return tens of millions of euro otherwise, the consistory would supposedly conveniantes to return to. "
According manifest from CEBAG, "We hope that the Mayor and the government team change their attitude and change their position. Because we support in their day, and continue to support the text and the spirit and guidelines of the new model agreed territorial and city by all political groups in December 2011. But we believe that this new model is impossible to translate on the structure and the "goal posts"-even as much as it is intended to review and modify a plan-inspired and built another model based on radically different from that described in the consensus guidelines. "
