Our Lt.
Mayor calls the "arms" and the citizen revolution that yes in "peace" for the issue of ADIF and the change of route of passage of the AVE for our city without prior knowledge of this City Council.
If this is done by this Councilman from the Plenary Hall, he falls the hurdle of the City Council over to use that language of war and why not say it as we are, fascist.
For saying bullshit that is not left.
I still remember some bullshit of this style, as a metaphor about the "stukas" and how badly my friend Juan José sat that political-military language that criticized me very "friendly" on Facebook and that according to him, it was nothing correct in the mouth of a novice public political representative like me.
That if something does not understand, or want to understand, is language l @ s @ s @ s for political interest @ s loading the language @.
If the same metaphor had been used by a sympathizer or politician of the left but with the "Chato" (fighter Polikarpov I-15 Soviet) the story would have been different and everything would have been a gracieta without importance, that is, very democratic and protected in the freedom of expression and such and such and such ...
But what the hell my Lt.
Mayor, I am with you and I neither ask nor ask for forgiveness for using military metaphors in the language, something otherwise very common in politics.
The Stukas I still have prepared, ammunition and with the full tank on the track heating engines.
If before they wanted to send, -metaphorically in relation to data I have to the headquarters of the Citizens of Murcia party to stop me from giving the "embers" with the theme that the act is the party and not take it.
Now I have no qualms whatsoever about putting them at your service to launch the necessary offensive attacks on the ADIF forces and so that our consistorial infantry can advance.
Because it is known that without air control, the infantry is lost on the ground.
The only thing that I did not like about his criticism in his day, is that in the end the subject was so twisted that it turned out that Councilman Carrillo wanted to bomb Totana.
Follow later in his statements with the military slang and already, treating these as "trampling" the citizenship and their rights, and must rectify then, "would come to mind a family member or this Councilman without going any further - saying it was the military but the "before" clear.
To me politicians now, violate my fundamental rights as a political office and when you have had the opportunity to defend those rights in the plenary session, you have not done so, "interpretanto" what you have come to win against judgments of the Supreme Court.
Well, readers know that the "before" military is like the revolutionary parties of the past, and of those who now feel so proud publicly of being heirs in the Spanish left and that before that "before" my Tte
Mayor refers, for the simple act of going to a mass, think differently or simply, think.
These parties solved their disagreements with the adversary with less motions.
They shot him in the back of the head or skinned him in a "Czech" (secret political police committee from the former Soviet Union that subjected the detainees to cruel tortures, especially in the Republican zone during the Spanish Civil War). , very democratically all because they were the ones who defended freedom and democracy, but theirs.
Well, the shot in the neck until a few years ago, was a method considered effective to carry out its political objectives some of the ideological heirs of those criminals.
And that had been a long time since there were no "before" military.
We were already "now".
But let's see if we "focus the shot" of the issue in question and do not ramble more by hitting "shots in the air" calling the cake revolution or to warm up the neighbors unnecessarily.
That for that we are supposed to be in democracy?
and that the "before" military and the political parties before the "before", thank God are not part of the political landscape, or ...?
The matches I mean.
Independent Councilman Carrillo supports a unit of action and action of the MUNICIPAL POLITICAL GROUPS on this issue facing the totaneros .
So that they can see the seriousness and good work of their local politicians from minute zero.
And this does not happen precisely, trying to present to the plenary each Political Group some motions or different proposals but with the same final conclusions to be wasting time in revolutionary soflamas, blaming the right of the death of Manolete or trying to provoke casualties with "friendly fire" taking advantage of the fact that the Pisuerga passes through Valladolid and the AVE pretends to pass through Totana.
In this matter of ADIF Councilman Carrillo believes that it should be Mr. Mayor who for that has the power ultimately, who takes the reins and write a joint proposal that at the same time that denounces the current situation, propose the lines of legal action aimed at starting both City Hall and the affected residents themselves, to resort to ADIF for the problems they see appropriate, without the need for legal representation expenses.
The deadline ends on May 4 for these allegations and now, I think that is the most important thing.
If before the Plenary morning did not give material time to take these measures.
Well leave it for a few days because with a joint statement or press conference of all the spokesmen of the groups with Mr. Mayor would be enough.
I say it so as not to spend more money in an extraordinary plenary session.
But something similar is done and in this line, it will be again prevailing in a certain way, the interest of the party to the citizens and will be trying to get political revenue with this matter.
The substantive questions about meetings, their correction and formality and the procedures carried out or not, about their communication to the rest of the Corporation that are resolved and clarified apart from the plenary session on Thursday.
I'm sure it will not be like that and we'll give another sad show.
It would be quite simple to coordinate this communication or joint motion if you wanted.
I have to say, even with embarrassment, that it is NOT POSSIBLE to include a motion in the order of the day once the registration deadlines and the informative commissions have passed and that the following procedure is already in the same plenary session.
It is the EMERGENCY procedure that once seen the points of the agenda and before moving on to the requests and questions, the Mayor will ASK IF THERE ARE EMERGENCY MOTIONS, which must be voted on INCLUSION FOR DEBATE by the members of the Corporation at that moment.
Since several motions have already been thrown to me in several moments of their procedure since I know it very well all the procedure.
What seems to be a lie that attempts to manipulate both a simple administrative procedure on the inclusion of a motion to full for trying to prevail the positioning of a particular political group and a party and then used politically where appropriate.
Because I find it hard to believe that after 30 years in active politics do not know even these things and yes or yes, there is only the process of urgency to include the motions that are outside the agenda already convened.
I will vote yes for the general good not for that of a party, while you have been vetoing that not voting, other motions of mine.
The last this month on the status of fire hydrants.
I insist, the plenary is tomorrow Thursday afternoon and for the moment, nobody from the Government has asked this Councilor anything in the final and definitive past the meeting of spokespersons on writing a joint URGENCY motion so that the AVE path approved in 2012 even if everyone agrees.
Instead, we go straight to give another pitiful spectacle to the totaneros.
Apart from returning to the plenary session, a series of motions, which should not even go as such, since this body does not have direct powers over these matters for its resolution and which only make us on the one hand lose time and money and for another, the game to the political parties facing the gallery while many local problems are neither touched nor treated nor is there the slightest intention of doing so.
The Independent Councilor
D. Juan C. Carrillo Ruiz.
